Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Michalski vs Sanjar Fayziev Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Michalski vs Fayziev analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Michalski vs Sanjar Fayziev Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Michalski 2 - 0 Fayziev
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Michalski has won 50.66% of points on their second serve, while Fayziev has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Michalski, in recent form, has won 52.08% of their opponent's second serve points, while Fayziev has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.88% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Michalski has saved 59.41% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fayziev has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Michalski has won 54.1% of matches played (W/L 33/ 28), with Fayziev winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 182/ 96), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6). Fayziev has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 46/ 35), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Michalski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.11% of matches (W/L 16/ 22), where as Fayziev has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 4/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Michalski winning 2 times and Fayziev being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Michalski winning 4 and Fayziev winning 1. The last match between Michalski and Fayziev was at the Prague 2 Challenger, 01-05-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Daniel Michalski getting the victory 5-7 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:50:44.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Michalski and Fayziev have played a deciding set 1 times, with Michalski winning 1 times and Fayziev 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Michalski winning 0, and Fayziev 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Michalski has played against opponents with an average rank of 256.51 while Fayziev has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Michalski has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fayziev has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Michalski has converted 46.91% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fayziev has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
363
Rank
243
High
24
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
899
Rank
253
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
62% (215-132)
Career Total W/L
56% (249-197)
50% (15-15)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Michalski | Sanjar Fayziev |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 29 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:44 | 1:50:44 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (78/126) | 64% (102/159) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (51/78) | 56% (57/102) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (30/48) | 37% (21/57) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 52% (13/25) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (81/159) | 36% (45/126) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Daniel Michalski
Player
Sanjar Fayziev
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
52 of
93)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
93)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Sanjar Fayziev
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
57%
(
17 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Michalski | Sanjar Fayziev |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (15/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (34/34) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (317/326) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 14% (1/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (12/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.14 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 43 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 66 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:25 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 330.8 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1340/2179) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (842/1340) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (425/839) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (91/194) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (856/2087) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 43% (10/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (15/30) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 70% (7/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (17/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 12% (17/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (13/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Daniel Michalski
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
August Holmgren
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Daniel Michalski
45%
(
35 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Daniel Michalski
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Norbert Gombos
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Daniel Michalski
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Branko Djuric
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
73%
(
24 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Daniel Michalski
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luigi Sorrentino
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Dax Donders
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Sanjar Fayziev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Zgirovsky
Player
Sanjar Fayziev
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
52%
(
52 of
100)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
98
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Ghibaudo
Player
Sanjar Fayziev
52%
(
49 of
94)
1st Serve %
51%
(
48 of
95)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adit Sinha
Player
Sanjar Fayziev
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
4-6 6-0 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-7(5) 7-5 10-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Tuncay Duran
Player
Sanjar Fayziev
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-2 10-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Sanjar Fayziev
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
75%
(
30 of
40)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
100%
(
13 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sanjar Fayziev
Player
Gabor Mathe
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Michalski Vs Fayziev Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
